Radiology,
illustrated.

Medical illustrators trained in anatomical precision produce every draft. Illustrations are reviewed through the radiology workflow for anatomical consistency and clinical relevance. Not a black-box model.

Always custom. Each illustration is built from the patient's actual imaging findings: the specific anatomy, level, mechanism, and severity. Stock anatomy diagrams do not meet the "fair representation" standard that courts and clinicians expect.

Yes. Courtroom-ready by design. Backed by the reading radiologist's credentials and supported by our Expert Witness service. Dr. Knapp has participated in over 400 depositions tied to our illustrated reports.

Tools accelerate production. The final illustration is always reviewed and verified by a human board-certified radiologist before it ships. This sidesteps the Daubert and admissibility risks that California Law Review and Bloomberg Law have flagged around AI-only medical imagery, where courts increasingly require evidence of training, validation, and error rates.

Timing depends on case complexity and current report volume. Because illustrations ship inside the report rather than as standalone legal exhibits, they follow the report workflow instead of the traditional 3 to 4 week medical-legal illustration process.

No. Every PrecisionPlus v3™ report includes custom illustrations. Report Enhancement adds them to outside reports. For reference, the industry average is roughly $900 per illustration in personal injury work.

HIPAA-compliant infrastructure, de-identified uploads, encrypted storage. The ExRad Portal workflow follows the same security posture as the rest of our stack.